Sony Ericsson's Xperia X10, formerly code-named "Rachel," is just way too hot for its own good. It's a great looking phone, and running Android on a 1GHz Snapdragon processor puts internal beauty in-line with external. You're going to pay a hefty price for the allure, though. According to the Wall Street Journal the phone will run $879 off contract. Yes, you read that correctly. $879.

If anything scares away American cell consumers it's high sticker price. Anyone walking around a carrier's showroom would practically vomit to see such a price, even after you'd explained the contract system in full detail. That's probably why Sony Ericsson is looking for a carrier to partner with on this side of the pond. The company has never made much of an impact over here, mostly because of high prices.

Though the article didn't mention, it seems plausible that the search for a carrier has delayed the phone's release. The product page used to list a February launch. That's gone now, back to TBA in the meantime.

Yesterday I wrote a post about the Android explosion and the problems facing developers because there are so many different Android phones. Basically there is so much different hardware out there that developers have to spend time debugging instead of creating new features/apps. Today brings news of the one phone to rule them all, one phone to find them, one phone to bring them all, and crush their pathetic features under the full weight of Google R&D.

I'm talking about the Google phone, a phone that has been rumored for months. Really, Android has been waiting for a flagship device. I thought the Droid was it at first, but pointless features like that crap keyboard made me think otherwise. Michael Arrington and the crew at TechCrunch seem to have the inside scoop on the phone, and they've been kind enough to share.

The phone is basically Google's vision of the perfect Android phone. As for features, there's really not much to say other than that. From the sound of things it's coming soon - think early 2010 - and will be sold both directly and through retailers. From the sound of things, it'll be built by either Samsung or LG, though Arrington thinks it'll be LG because Samsung already makes parts for the iPhone.

The phone would bring up the issue of competing with customers for Google. Making its own phone means other manufacturers will be going head-to-head with the company that makes the software. A recent update suggests the Google phone might be designed for data-only voice connections, which might assuage some of those concerns. It would still require a carrier - TechCrunch's source says Google is considering AT&T for now - but calls would only be made over a data connection.

If nothing else, I'd be interested to see what Google considers the ideal Android phone. The Droid was good, but too many features felt like an afterthought.

Source: TechCrunch (first article / second article)

For the most part I'm still comfortable saying that Android growth is a good thing. The platform still needs to expand its app offering to be able to effectively compete with the iPhone. But while most would consider the number of devices sporting Android these days a good thing, it could drive developers crazy.

Android's adaptability is one of its best features, but it's a bit of a nightmare for developers. It means making sure apps work on all kinds of hardware, while iPhone developers have just one handset to worry about. For big developers its less of a problem, but for the small guys it means spending time debugging instead of updating apps and releasing new features. “You may build an app that works perfectly with all three firmwares, but then when you run it on carriers’ ROMs it completely blows up,” said Chris Fagan, co-founder of the Android development house Froogloid. “So we find ourselves having to create apps that are compatible with multiple firmwares, multiple ROMs and multiple devices with different hardware.”

Obviously this could cause some problems for carriers as well. As newer versions of the OS are released, older handsets might be left with out-of-date applications that no longer receive support from developers. Even though Android's open-source platform means it can be hacked onto older devices, some of the features won't work, like multi-touch from 2.0 on the original HTC G1.

Unfortunately that's probably just what will happen. Developers will decide who they want to target and just support a set of devices. Everyone else will be stuck wishing they'd paid the extra benjy for the next phone up.

Source: Wired

Verizon had to respond to the AT&T lawsuit at some point, but I didn't think the response would be so catty. And boy is it catty. Verizon lawyers have dropped all the legalese in order to get a few more digs at AT&T and its crappy network.

The response opens like this: "AT&T did not file this lawsuit because Verizon's "There's A Map For That" advertisements are untrue; AT&T sued because Verizon's ads are true and the truth hurts." So it's gonna be like that then? And that's just what the lawyers are saying. Imagine how much worse things could get over the airwaves.

As Engadget points out, the rest of the response reads more like a press release than a legal document. Here's another tidbit:

In the final analysis, AT&T seeks emergency relief because Verizon's side-by-side, apples-to-apples comparison of its own 3G coverage with AT&T's confirms what the marketplace has been saying for months: AT&T failed to invest adequately in the necessary infrastructure to expand its 3G coverage to support its growth in smartphone business, and the usefulness of its service to smartphone users has suffered accordingly.

Like most things involving WebOS and the new Palm devices, the Facebook app for WebOS is underwhelming. Actually, it's worse than that, considering how far app development has come since the smartphone app craze started. Maybe they should get Joe Hewitt involved? I hear he's done with that other project he's been working on.

The problem is just a total lack of features. You get unfiltered news feeds, even if you've unselected application updates in your profile, and videos and links pull you out of the app. Sure it's nice to multitask but to do so unnecessarily is just silly. There's seemingly no search feature, no way to access events, and clicking another person's name seems to bring up little more than contact info.

What can you do? Well, you can upload pictures and post status updates and...well that seems to be about it. Another compelling reason to get a Palm Pre.

Now that the Droid has launched we all want to know how many have sold. Well, I want to know anyway, and I'm guessing a few of you probably do as well. If you take Bloomberg's word, opening weekend showed 110,000 units sold. Developer uLocate, which develops the GPS app "Where" has confirmed those numbers and done one better.

According to uLocate, the Where app typically gets installed on 10% of new Android devices in the first month, jumping to a 25% penetration rate thereafter. The same was true for the Droid, boasting 11,000 downloads during opening weekend. Since last weekend that number is up to 25,000, meaning we're looking at 250,000 Droid sales in the first week. Considering the Palm Pre only sold 300,000 in its first month, that number's looking pretty good. Doesn't hurt that you can get the Droid on Verizon who, despite recent bad press concerning fees, is the most desirable network in the country (though T-Mobile is probably a close second with its new plans).

Hopefully it's onward and upward for the Droid. I'm not personally a fan, but success of the handset means good things for Android, and that's something I can get behind.

Source: Boy Genius Report

Rumors that Nokia might take a look at purchasing Palm resurfaced today, giving Palm stock an eight percent bump. It's a deal we've been hearing about for months, though not always with Nokia as the buyer. There have also been rumors that Dell or Microsoft could nab the struggling mobile company.

Let's consider the Nokia thing for a minute, though. I would be amazed to see it drop the estimated $2 billion to purchase Palm, especially since Palm isn't exactly going gangbusters. Stock dipped 30% after this same deal failed to mature in September. So why would Nokia spend so much just to acquire the company, not to mention the marketing that Palm needs to stay alive, when the Finnish handset manufacturer is bleeding market share to Apple every day? It just doesn't make sense.

Palm's struggling stock is a clear reminder that the company needs help, but I don't think it would bring enough value to any of the potential buyers to make a deal reasonable. If anything, Nokia could license WebOS for a facelift on a few devices, but even Palm's operating system seems to have an expiration date looming in the near future.

Starting tomorrow, Walmart's offering a pretty nice deal for new Blackberry owners. When you purchase a new Blackberry, either in the store or online, you'll get a $100 gift, which you'll likely then blow on chargers and other accessories. It's a great deal, and it runs through the end of next week.

The deal works like a rebate for online purchases, so you're waiting 4-6 weeks for your card, but in-store purchases get the gift card instantly. And yes, this is for two-year contracts only.

As for the phones you can get, Walmart carries the following Blackberry devices:

- AT&T Curve 8310
- AT&T Bold 9000
- Sprint Curve 8330
- T-Mobile 8520
- T-Mobile Pearl 8120
- Verizon Storm
- Verizon Storm II

Again, deal runs from the 14th to the 21st.

Apple has been slowly stealing Nokia's market share since the release of the iPhone, but this past quarter it finally passed the Finnish handset manufacturer. By a mile. Well, half a billion dollars actually, but that's not how the saying goes.

At first glance it might not seem like terrible news for Nokia. According to research firm Strategy Analytics the company still leads in overall handset share, shipping over 108 million handsets in the third quarter (compared to 7.4 million iPhones). But that actually makes the news worse. Nokia is selling more phones - nearly 15 times as many - but losing in profits by 50% of what the company earned? That's insane, and it's a trend that will likely continue. Apple has put the iPhone on multiple carriers overseas to great success, something we'll likely see stateside in the near future.

The Strategy Analytics report points to several factors for Apple's success, high subsidies and low manufacturing costs among them. There's no reason those things should change for Apple anytime soon. Enough people want the iPhone that carriers would be crazy to boycott the phone based on the price. It's a problem that points back to branding. If you asked a hundred people what an iPhone is I'd guess 85 or more could tell you, most in great detail. Ask about an N97 and you might get 10. 15 tops. How long before the same can be said for Nokia itself?

Today Samsung announced that it was entering the open mobile operating system business with a service called "bada." It's still unclear as to the plan for the system, but we at least know that it's not for smartphones. Yes, Samsung has designed a feature phone OS with its own SDK to lure in developers. And by "lure" I mean attract so few developers that the plan is scrapped for a stripped-down version of Android in the next year or two.

There are precious few details about the operating system. The press release tells us that the word bada means "ocean" in Korean, which "was chosen to convey the limitless variety of potential applications which can be created using the new platform." Awww, your optimism is so adorable, Samsung. Really, that's about all we know. The rest is coming in December, which is when Samsung will release the SDK. Wait - an SDK release just a month after the OS is announced? Are you watching this, Palm? Hmm?

Remember that free Photoshop app for the iPhone? Adobe's finally released a version for Android, roughly a month after the iPhone version became available.

It's basically the same app, though with a few differences for both better and worse. For starters, the Android version displays the phone's entire photo library within the application. With the iPhone version you have to go through an extra step to select your photo. Not a huge difference, but it's nice.

On the flipside, the Android version doesn't have the pinch or twist functionality for straightening out your pictures. The feature is still there, just as a menu item instead of the multitouch. Again, not a big deal, and frankly the Photoshop app probably won't be the pivotal factor if you're deciding between the two platforms. For either OS, it's a nice app.

There's a worm spreading among jailbroken iPhones in Australia that makes one hilarious modification. The virus changes the iPhone wallpaper to a picture of Rick Astley. Luckily for those who have picked up the bug, there is no malicious code involved. It's just a stunt by a 21-year old who hopes to get a few laughs and get people to get a little more serious about phone security.

"The virus itself is not malicious and is not out to hurt people. It's just poking fun and hoping waking people up a little," said the creator, who lives in Sydney. For those of you who are unaware, jailbroken phones can be accessed using the password "alpine" for SSH control. If you don't change the password upon jailbreaking, anyone with a little tech savvy can add or remove files to/from your iPhone.

Luckily for you, the fix is really simple. Just load up Cydia and get the MobileTerminal app, and then use the "passwd" command to make the necessary change. And do it now. Rick Astley may seem harmless, but he's just a gateway drug to much more serious problems.

AT&T might have done well to keep quiet about Verizon’s “map for that” ads. Since bringing a lawsuit concerning the original commercial, Verizon has launched three more ads, all bearing the same message: AT&T’s network sucks. It’s not that the message is anything new, but AT&T has made it clear that network quality is a pressure point, and now Verizon’s going to squeeze.

The new ads will likely air all through the holidays since they’re all about Christmas. In one the iPhone ends up on the island of misfit toys, not fitting in until it shows its new friends the AT&T 3G coverage map. That one works on two levels, digging at AT&T and reminding Apple that Verizon still really wants the iPhone.

The second ad turns the naughty gift from coal into AT&T’s network, and the third features a man having a Blue Christmas (yes, the song runs in the background) until he walks home to find a festive red package sitting on his front porch.

The last two ads sound like the usual competition bashing you see in any industry, but that the commercials have so much truth behind them makes them devastatingly effective. Talk to anyone with an iPhone and you’ll hear about AT&T’s crap network. Apparently no one has mentioned to Big Blue that fixing their network would solve all kinds of problems, the least of which is this new ad campaign.

iPhone Nano rumors started to resurface this week, based on photos from a manufacturer and supposed insider reports that Apple is working up a device for Verizon’s CDMA network.

The rumored device would sport a hybrid UMTS/CDMA radio, making it compatible with pretty much any network. The screen is down from 3.5 inches to 2.8, which seems way too small to me. Granted, there's always zooming to get to hard to read text, but there's really nothing worse than scrolling a page around while you're trying to read.

Speculation points to a 2010 release, which would make sense considering the massive Android rollout that has been taking place. As Android makes it onto more devices, particularly cheaper ones, Apple’s going to want a way to get those entry-level smartphone owners. A smaller iPhone might not get those folks, but a cheaper one definitely would.

I was pretty excited to go out and get my hands on a Droid yesterday. I made my way out to a local Verizon store, where a new owner was kind enough to let me play around with the phone and make a few calls. I have to say, I was pretty impressed with the device. The screen looks incredible and the whole thing operates pretty quickly. Call quality was better than my iPhone, but what isn't. What I can't understand, though, is why Motorola added the physical keyboard. It's not that a hardware keyboard is a bad idea, but that keyboard is the bad idea.

Seriously, that keyboard is terrible. The keys are too close together and so difficult to push that I found myself hitting multiple keys at once pretty often. The top row is too close to the slider, making it difficult to get my thumbs in there to push. The keyboard seems even more out of place when you use the virtual keyboard. I didn't like it as well as the iPhone, probably because of the lack of multi-touch support, but it's the best I've used outside an Apple product.

The obvious conclusion is that it's meant to be a differentiator from the iPhone. Unfortunately, it detracts from the quality of the phone, and makes it a lot thicker than is necessary. I think part of the problem is that no one wants to make anything so close to the iPhone that an exec says, "Well why wouldn't they just buy an iPhone," and that's a terrible strategy. The iPhone is great, but it can be improved upon, and there are people who just want something a little different. So give them Android, but leave the pointless differentiators on the design table.

My only other problem with the phone is the Android Market. It's still too barren to make me seriously consider a switch, even if it would mean Google Voice and Google Navigation.